• Publishing Ethics and Malpractice Statement

     

    The Proceedings of Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems and its editorial team are committed to ensuring the integrity of the academic publishing process. All stakeholders involved in the publication—including authors, reviewers, editors, and the publisher—are expected to adhere strictly to ethical guidelines in accordance with the best practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

    1. Responsibilities of the Editor-in-Chief and Executive Secretary

    Editorial Decision-Making

    The Editor-in-Chief and Executive Secretary are responsible for deciding which submitted manuscripts are suitable for publication. This decision is based on the manuscript’s scholarly merit, originality, relevance to the journal's scope, and compliance with ethical standards. The editors also ensure compliance with copyright laws and actively address cases of plagiarism and defamation. Expert reviewers may be consulted during the decision-making process.

    Fair Evaluation

    Manuscripts are evaluated solely based on academic merit, without discrimination based on the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, nationality, or political affiliation.

    Confidentiality

    All editorial staff, including editors and members of the editorial board, must maintain confidentiality regarding all submitted manuscripts. Information about a submission may only be shared with the corresponding author, reviewers, or other editorial advisors.

    Conflicts of Interest

    Editors must not use unpublished materials disclosed in submitted manuscripts for their own research without the author's written consent. In cases of potential conflicts of interest arising from professional or personal relationships, the editor must recuse themselves from the review and decision-making process, delegating responsibility to another qualified editor.

    2. Responsibilities of Reviewers

    Contribution to Editorial Decisions

    Peer reviewers assist the editorial board in making publication decisions and help authors improve their manuscripts through constructive feedback.

    Declining a Review

    If a reviewer feels unqualified to review a manuscript or cannot meet the deadline, they must notify the editor promptly and decline the review.

    Confidentiality

    All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shared or discussed with others, except with explicit permission from the editor.

    Objectivity

    Reviews should be conducted objectively and without bias. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should clearly support their evaluations with logical arguments.

    Acknowledgement of Sources

    Reviewers should identify relevant, previously published work that the authors have not cited. If a reviewer suspects plagiarism or redundancy, this must be reported to the editor.

    Conflicts of Interest

    Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest and refrain from reviewing manuscripts where such conflicts exist due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors or affiliated institutions. Unpublished material disclosed in a manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without written consent from the author.

    3. Responsibilities of Authors

    Reporting Standards

    Authors must present their research accurately and objectively. Data should be presented truthfully, and sufficient detail should be provided to allow others to replicate the study. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable.

    Data Access and Retention

    Authors should be prepared to provide raw data related to their manuscript for editorial review, and should retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

    Originality and Plagiarism

    Manuscripts must be original. Authors must properly cite or quote the work and ideas of others. Any form of plagiarism is unacceptable.

    Multiple or Redundant Publication

    Authors must not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal or conference simultaneously. Submitting previously published work without appropriate citation or justification is considered unethical.

    Acknowledgment of Sources

    Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must be given. Information obtained through private communication or confidential services (e.g., grant applications) must not be used without written permission.

    Authorship Criteria

    Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. All co-authors must approve the final manuscript and agree to its submission. Contributors who do not meet authorship criteria should be acknowledged with their consent.

    Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest

    All authors must disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that could influence the interpretation of the findings. All sources of funding must be acknowledged, including institutional affiliations, consultancies, stock ownership, or patent licenses.

    Correction of Errors

    If an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, they must promptly notify the editorial office and cooperate to retract or correct the article. If errors are reported by a third party, authors must respond promptly with appropriate clarifications or corrections.


    🔹 4. Publisher Responsibilities

    The publisher of SEI ensures that best practices in publication ethics are followed at all stages of the editorial and publishing process. The publisher collaborates with editors, reviewers, and authors to:

    • Detect and prevent publication misconduct;

    • Promote transparency and ethical behavior;

    • Uphold academic standards.

    In confirmed cases of misconduct (e.g., plagiarism, data falsification, unethical research), the publisher will take appropriate action in line with COPE guidelines, including retraction, correction, or publication of an expression of concern.

    🔹 5. Handling of Misconduct

    Misconduct Investigation:
    Allegations of unethical conduct—such as plagiarism, data fabrication, or duplicate publication—will be investigated thoroughly in accordance with COPE’s recommended procedures.

    Corrective Measures:
    If misconduct is confirmed, the journal may issue corrections, retractions, or editorial notes as necessary. Authors, institutions, or funders may also be informed where appropriate.

    🔹 6. Additional Editorial Ethics and Responsibilities

    Editorial Oversight:
    Editors must:

    • Ensure the academic quality and integrity of content published;

    • Protect authors’ freedom of expression within the boundaries of academic responsibility;

    • Prevent scientific and ethical violations;

    • Be open to issuing corrections, retractions, or apologies when needed;

    • Avoid unnecessary delays in the editorial process.

    Author Rights and Responsibilities:

    • Authors warrant that submitted manuscripts are original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere.

    • All sources must be properly cited and referenced.

    • All listed authors must have made direct academic contributions to the work.

    • Individuals without substantial academic involvement should not be listed as authors.

    📌 Resources and Guidance

    Privacy Statement

    All names, email addresses, and personal data provided on this journal’s website will be used exclusively for the purposes of the journal and will not be made available to any other party or for any other use.